0
Towers Touchingprettyexposedmomanddaughter S Keezmovies%3Bsom Pl Pages RIP Kendra Kaeleen Tucker You Will Be Missed 197036920333054 Go Out With Exquisite Females Female Gender Confusion is in the Jeans - henrymakow.com
Towers Touchingprettyexposedmomanddaughter S Keezmovies%3Bsom Pl Pages RIP Kendra Kaeleen Tucker You Will Be Missed 197036920333054 Go Out With Exquisite Females
Towers search You
Keezmovies%3Bsom search
Carmen said (September 29, 2009):
es, the scales have fallen off my eyes thanks to your writings and it appalling how sloppily many women dress to go to the grocery, shopping etc. Years ago I gave up viewing any t.v. or going to movie theaters, still I order and view at home old classics from the 40's and 50's. In those days both men and women wore hats and the ladies also wore gloves and the manners were impeccable. Also, in any hospital scene the nurses (all female) wore white uniforms, hats, and looked so professional and almost angelic. Compare that with the current grotesque prison uniform looking unisex slouchy scrubs worn by the p.c. label of "health care workers". Really, in doing prison ministry for a short while in the local women's prison their uniforms were basically the same as what we see in hospitals and doctor's offices now. It is a challenge to find lovely feminine clothes these days though still possible with effort. Now that so few women are taught to sew their own or their families clothes it could be we are being set up to wear some corporate recycled hideously ugly one size fits all for either sex nwo slave worker uniform. How they love extreme equality and despise anything lovely or that sets one apart from the masses; i.e. slaves.
Jeffrey said (September 29, 2009):
I enjoy your articles and have, for some time. I do believe we have a "cluster" in regards to women's behavior and their roles in society today. Right is wrong and wrong is right. However, being a male, and proud of it, I see the so called "problem" to be just as much on the male side as on the female side. Men in America have lost their way, plain and simple. And if I was a women, I sure wouldn't want to align myself with the other sex. Most men in America are raised to be control freaks and who wants to be controlled by a freak? Look how they were brought up. By parents who were also brought up on the famous "dysfunctional" family. Before you point the finger, Henry, focus on our sex for awhile. It's a control issue that's got out of hand. Lesbianism/Feminism is a symptom of a much deeper disorder related to both sexes. Back off the ladies until you've given men their fair share of abuse. And maybe you need to realize, Henry, that women do not want to
be controlled. Who does? You talk about it as if it's man's role to control them. No, it is not. It is man's role to "Provide" for them while it is their role to "nourish" the man.
A man's body and nervous system is generally more capable of going out in the relative world and bringing in the food, so to speak. And equally important is the female form, much more refined and tuned in to intuition, stays at home to feed the family, so to speak. Each role is vitally important. Each role is equal. No one controls the other because both are consciously aware of who and what they are and what their role is in the bigger picture. And it is Love, unconditional, that fuels the relationship. If it is not unconditional, then it will NEVER work. NEVER! And it takes two for that to work. Both parties must be established in their "higher" functioning Selves. If it's just "me, me, me" it will never work. We are talking about Consciousness, here, Henry. Only Consciousness, that which enables us to get beyond the boundaries of life, can lead the way.
In my opinion, when the strong family nucleus is in top working order, the female, by far, is the most important piece to a smoothly running, healthy society. A male, comfortable in himself, knows that. An insecure male, wants to control. Sometimes I read into your words Henry, personal issues you have with this "control" thing. Let it go. Get beyond it. Love your spouse, and those who love or hate you, unconditionally.
EJ said (September 29, 2009):
I'm online at a library in Livingston, MT and I just came back in from a break and on the way back from my car I saw a mid-30ish woman in nice skirt and said: "Great looking skirt." She smiled, almost surprised, and thanked me. Then I go back on line at Rense and click on your article...nuff said, I agree with you.
The masculinization of women has really been sad. As a straight, 67 yo man with plenty of fire down below I have always fallen for women who were, as I call them, hippies in high heels. These were women who loved being a woman but had no problems with using their muscles as well...gardening, frisbee, hiking, etc. They would always have a feminine touch to their "outfits" which kept anyone looking in touch with the fact that they were women, women who love men.
I believe it was you who wrote about women thinking they were "hotter" then they really were and this ego made it difficult for them to date, etc.??
I believe through many reasons, most of them social engineering, we are way out of balance in our society. Thank you for help pointing these things out, I know you get a lot of crap from those fluoride headed folks who, as Richard Bach said: "Argue for their limitations..." but stay strong we need some healthy discourse in this lie filled world.
Ken said (September 29, 2009):
I suppose some may call you an old fuddy duddy here, but as a somewhat younger man, I wholeheartedly agree with you.
Frankly, it's almost an act of rebellion these days when you see a woman actually choosing to look like a woman.
I had an incident a few years back with a female doctor that threw me for a loop. When she came into the room, she was wearing a flower print skirt and a pink top and a pink ribbon in her hair. She was absolutely adorable and I was instantly infatuated. Most female doctors I've seen have actually gone in the other direction and made a conscious effort to look manly. I think they think it gives them more credibility.
This lady (and a Lady she was), didn't feel the need to augment her credentials with man pants, and I found the effect of being professionally and competently examined by this exquisite female to be the highlight of my month.
Alas, some lucky guy had already snapped her up.
She didn't seem to mind my obvious interest, however, unlike a lot of lower quality females who have been taught that male interest in them is somehow "demeaning."
I never found out where she stood on things politically, but I have to believe that a woman in her position who so openly celebrates her femininity is making a statement of some kind.
Carol said (September 29, 2009):
Fine, I will go back to wearing dresses when (as a middle aged woman with a middle aged figure) I can once again buy a dress that is feminine and flattering, and does not look like a black bag with a hole cut in the bottom for my head to go through.
I have been wearing jeans for 40 years, and never did sympathize with the women's lib movement. I wear them now because I work outside and inside both, and they provide protection for my knees. If you have never scrubbed floors in your bare knees, I suggest you try it sometime. Then rethink your article. You are too, too narrow minded.
You may be quite right about the Rockefellers et al, but I truly resent being cast in with the feminists because I wear jeans. All women wear jeans here in the inland West, and few of them are feminists. In fact, we are popularized as red-necks here.
Open your eyes, there is a world outside of Los Angeles and New York that you never dreamed of.
--
Thanks, I live in Winnipeg!
henry
Kevin said (September 29, 2009):
I am a single male living in the big city, and have become quite displeased with what women have become.
But about your article, I feel you are right on. A summer dress makes men stare, but not necessarily in a completely lustful way, but in a way that recognizes beauty and femininity. You are thinking of "She looks beautiful" more than "I want to take her to bed".
I purchased a summer dress for my ex girlfriend, and it is almost like her personality changed while she was wearing it. Even though she did look good in jeans, the summer dress made her seem simply more feminine, graceful, elegant, etc. A woman will never look that way in jeans.
DC said (September 28, 2009):
Here on the west coast of California, over the past five years, I have noticed that the retail outlets slowly withdrew dresses from junior and women's sections of their stores and increased the racks upon racks of jeans. Now the skirt is displayed only in the eveningwear section of the store. There is no choice for women young or old; every day dresses are not available. (Reminds me of the communist China laws forcing make men and women to wear the same uniform.)
To further the angst, the young women are now subjected to the fashion of the very tight jean leg (back in the late 50s/early 60's the young American male was pegging his jeans), the result of which is horizontal creases that "point" to the anus in back and to the "camel toe" in front. Even a mini dress was more modest (and was worn with the new invention, panty hose, or tights).
Women do not choose these clothes; corporations choose what they shall wear. Corporations. Corporations run our government. Women here do not think they are perpetuating a proletarian vision; they are told through the media and the stores what they should be wearing and really do not think beyond looking good to themselves, for other women, and must be getting feedback from their available males that they are dressed appropriately when together.
I have also noticed that attire for church, graduations, weddings, operas, dinner out, etc., etc. has gone to jeans with only the woman's top glamourized for whatever occasion. And again, this has occurred over the last five years, under the neoconservatism of the Bush administration and continuing on under the Obama administration. The true purpose of jeans on women is more insidious and pernicious than you think, Mr. Makow, and will not soon be undone.
Isabella said (September 28, 2009):
A friend of mine who escaped from the mind-control cult of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society (Jehovah's Witnesses) said that the one marker that stood out about their mind-control techniques was that the organization attaches Biblical scriptures to their opinions in order to get members to mindlessly obey and agree with their dogma.
I have to say that I have enjoyed reading a few of your articles, but this thing you've penned is decidedly one of the most ridiculous articles I've ever had the misfortune of reading. And attempting to link your OPINION with world events such as "feminism" and the "central bankers" to gain reader sympathy is what is called a cheap shot in the literary world, and is EXACTLY the same type of mind-control practiced in cults to gain the sympathy of their members.
You KNEW your underhanded opinion would be met with scorn and ridicule, so to make it more palatable, you attempted to link this chauvinistic opinion of yours to issues you KNOW your readers already agree with you on.
I wear jeans, and enjoy their design--and always WILL! I don't give a rat's ass about looking like a man, and wear dresses and skirts when I CHOOSE to wear them. You, Dr. Makow, have lost my respect. And it was because of chauvinist think-tanks like you that the Women's Movement was NECESSARY!!! If the minority cannot reason with an UNREASONABLE master, then someone comes along to provide the RELIEF! And it is for this very reason that Christ cautioned those taking the lead to NOT oppress the ones they lead, lest the leaders find themselves given into the hands of an even harsher master!
The oppressors of the world have come face-to-face with an even harsher master in the hands of the globalists, and while you sit on your stoop and whine about the demise of freedom, you CONTINUE to beat the weaker vessel over the head with the whipping chain that got the world into this mess in the first place! You think exactly like the globalists, Makow. The only difference is that your version of oppression is directed solely at women; the globalists, however, want a much bigger spoil.
0 You 9 Missed :